2007 Anual Data Repot (ADR) Text Based
Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States

 

Appendices - B

Appendix A
In this appendix we present details on the USRDS database, its standardized working datasets and specialized code definitions, and our common data processing practices. We also detail the statistical methods used in this ADR. The Researcher’s Guide to the USRDS Database, available online, provides additional detail about the database and Standard Analysis Files.

Appendix B
Products and services provided by the USRDS to support the work of the renal community are detailed in Table b.a. The entire ADR is available at www.usrds.org, with PowerPoint slides of all figures and Excel files of the data behind the graphs; included as well are PDF files of the Researcher’s Guide. The site’s RenDER system allows users to create customized data sets and regional maps. Data on website use are presented in Figure b.1.

This Chapter
     
  View PDF
     
 
 
Download
     
  gggggg Download PDF:  WIN*   MAC*
     
 
 
     
search this page
search all chapters

 

Appendix B

Data requests

Making information on ESRD available to the renal community is a primary objective of the USRDS, and we are committed to the timely fulfillment of data requests. In many cases requests can be answered by providing data published in the ADR or elsewhere. Requests for data not available in material published by the USRDS, but that require two hours or less of staff time, are fulfilled by the Coordinating Center without charge, usually within one week. More complex requests—those requiring more than two hours of staff time—as well as requests for Standard Analysis Files and custom files, must be accompanied by a written proposal (see details below), and will be completed only upon written approval by the NIDDK Project Officer.

Research files  Top

The Coordinating Center maintains a set of Standard Analysis Files (SAFs) to meet diverse research needs and provide easy access to data used in the ADR. The SAFs were introduced in 1994, as the NIDDK began awarding new grants focusing on research using the USRDS data. The result has been an annual increase in the number of files provided by the USRDS.

Prior to 1994 all researcher files were created for specific projects. Since the introduction of the SAFs, however, custom files are generally limited to cases in which a researcher provides a patient finder file to be matched with the USRDS database. For more information on merged data requests, please contact the Coordinating Center at usrds@usrds.org.

The three-CD Core SAF set contains basic patient data, and is needed to use any of the other SAFs. Included are each patient’s demographic information, payor and treatment history, limited transplant data, provider data, and all data from the USRDS Special Studies. Approximately half of the researchers using the USRDS SAFs need only this CD set. Full transplant information is provided on a separate CD that contains detailed transplant and transplant follow-up data collected by CMS and UNOS. Data on hospital inpatient stays are found on the hospitalization CD. All Medicare billing data are available by individual year (see Table b.c).

Standard Analysis Files

The use of Standard Analysis Files is governed by the USRDS policy on data release for investigator-initiated research (page 305). Research proposals must be approved by a USRDS Project Officer, and researchers must sign the USRDS “Agreement for Release of Data” (page 303). File prices are listed in Table b.c.

Most SAFs provide patient-specific data. All patient identifiers are removed from the files or encrypted, but data confidentiality is still a serious concern. The “Agreement for Release of Data” describes restrictions on the use and disposition of the SAFs. The SAFs include an encrypted ID number to allow patient data from multiple SAFs to be merged.

CORE CDs

The Core Standard Analysis File CDs contain the most frequently used SAFs, including those from the Special Studies, and are needed for use of the Transplant CD, the Hospital CD, or any CD based on Medicare claims data. Included files are as follows (and are also listed in Table b.b).

Patient Contains one record per patient in the USRDS database, and gives basic demographic and ESRD-related data.

Residence A longitudinal record, to ZIP code level, of patient residence.

Payor History Contains a new record for each patient at each change in insurance payor.

Treatment History Modality Sequence Contains a new record for each patient at each change in modality or dialysis provider.

Medical Evidence Contains full data from the 1995 version of the CMS Medical Evidence form, the data source for the primary disease causing renal failure and the start date of chronic renal dialysis. In April 1995 a new version of the form went into use that includes data on comorbidity, employment status, laboratory values at the start of dialysis, and Hispanic ethnicity.

Transplant Contains basic data for all transplants (reported by CMS and UNOS), including the date of graft failure (detailed transplant data are contained on a separate transplant CD).

Transplant Wait List Beginning with 2001 data (used in the 2002 ADR), this CD has been updated to include basic patient demographic data and, from UNOS, all unique wait-list periods for each dialysis patient.

Facility Conducted annually, the CMS End-Stage Renal Disease Facility Survey is the source of data for the Facility SAF, which can be linked to the Facility Cost Report files using the USRDS provider ID. Geographic variables that could identify facilities are deleted. The survey period is January 1 through December 31.

Facility Cost Reports CMS hospital and independent facility cost reports for 1989–1995 and 1989–1993, respectively, are available as SAFs. All geographic variables are deleted to ensure confidentiality. The files may be linked to the Facility SAF using the USRDS provider ID, though analyses at less than a regional or network level are not possible. Because these files are rarely used, additional data will be added only if there is sufficient demand.

Dialyzers The Case Mix Severity, Case Mix Adequacy, and DMMS Special Studies collected information on patient dialyzers. SAFs for these studies describe the dialyzer through a code, which must be matched to information in the Dialyzer file to find the manufacturer and model along with characteristics such as membrane type and clearance. We believe that these data, from published sources available at the time of the study, accurately represent the dialyzer characteristics, but they should be used with caution.

Data from Special Studies

Topics for USRDS Special Studies are approved by the NIDDK, with recommendations from CMS, the Scientific Advisory Committee, the ESRD networks, and the Renal Community Council. Design and sampling plans are developed, samples are selected, and data collection forms and instructions are drafted, tested, and finalized. The main studies to date are summarized below, and are detailed in the Researcher’s Guide.

Dialysis Morbidity & Mortality Study (DMMS) The DMMS was a USRDS Special Study in which data on demographics, comorbidity, laboratory values, treatment, socioeconomic factors, and insurance were collected, using dialysis records, for a random sample of U.S. patients. Waves 1, 3, and 4 are historical prospective studies in which data were collected for patients on in-center hemodialysis on December 31, 1993. Data were abstracted from medical records, and patients were followed to the earliest of data abstraction, death, transplant, change in modality, or transfer to another facility. Wave 2 is a prospective study of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients for 1996 and early 1997.

Case Mix Adequacy Study of Dialysis The objectives of this USRDS Special Study were to establish the relationship between the dose of delivered dialysis therapy and mortality, determine the strength of this relationship when data are adjusted for comorbidity, assess how this relationship changes with dialysis dose, assess how this relationship is affected by dialyzer reuse, and examine the impact of different dialysis membranes on patient morbidity and mortality.

The study consisted of two groups: an incident sample of ESRD patients who began hemodialysis in 1990, and a prevalent sample of hemodialysis patients whose ESRD began prior to 1990. A total of 7,096 patients from 523 dialysis units were included, with approximately 3,300 patients having both the pre- and post-BUN values needed to calculate delivered dialysis dose. Ninety-four percent of these cases were matched to the USRDS database. The ESRD networks collected these data in conjunction with their Medical Case Review data abstraction.

Case Mix Severity Study For this USRDS Special Study, data were collected on 5,255 patients incident in 1986–87 at 328 dialysis units nationwide. Objectives were to estimate the correlation of comorbidity and other factors existing at the onset of ESRD to mortality and hospitalization rates, while adjusting for age, gender, race, and primary diagnosis; evaluate possible associations of these factors with reported causes of death; assess the distribution of comorbidity and other factors among patients on different modalities; and compare relative mortality rates by treatment modality, adjusting for comorbid conditions and other factors.

Pediatric Growth & Development The objectives of the USRDS Pediatric Growth and Development Study were to establish a baseline for assessing the relation of pediatric patient growth and sexual maturation to modality, and establish a prototype for the ongoing collection of pediatric data. All patients prevalent in 1990 and born after December 31, 1970 were included in the study, a total of 3,067 patients at 548 units.

CAPD & Peritonitis Study The USRDS CAPD and Peritonitis Study examined the relation of peritonitis episodes in CAPD patients to connection device technology and other factors. The study population included all patients newly starting CAPD in the first six months of 1989, a maximum of 14 patients per dialysis unit. All units providing CAPD training participated in the study. The sample contains data on 3,385 patients from 706 units.

TRANSPLANT CDs

Due to changes in data collection sources over the years, data related to transplants are now presented in eight separate SAFs. The first two are included on the Core CD, and the remaining six are included on two separate Transplant CDs.

  • TX: includes minimum details about all transplants from all sources
  • TXWAIT: contains one record for each patient in the USRDS database per wait list event
  • TXHCFA: includes transplant information collected by CMS’s PMMIS system prior to 1994
  • TXUNOS: includes transplant information collected since 1987 by UNOS, currently the main source of transplant data for the USRDS
  • TXIRUNOS: includes information on immunosuppressive drugs collected by UNOS at the time of transplantation events
  • TXFUHCFA: includes transplant follow-up reports collected by CMS prior to 1994; reports are completed at discharge, six months, each year post-transplant, and at graft failure
  • TXFUUNOS: includes transplant follow-up reports collected by UNOS since 1988
  • TXIFUNOS: includes information on immunosuppressive drugs, collected by UNOS at follow-up visits

Tables in Reference Sections E and F are produced primarily from the CMS and UNOS transplant files.

In July 1994, CMS and the Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA) consolidated transplant data into a single collection by UNOS under its contract with HRSA. The expanded transplant data are shared among HRSA, CMS, and the NIH, and are thus available to the USRDS. This has resulted in the addition of data on a substantial number of non-Medicare transplant patients, including children.

CMS and UNOS transplant files overlap for 1988–1993, and some Medical Evidence (ME) forms and institutional claims records indicate transplants not included in either file. To resolve conflicts among the sources and create the transplant SAF, all UNOS transplants are first accepted into the file, with all pre-1988 CMS transplants accepted next. CMS transplants from 1988–1993 are then accepted if there is no transplant in the file for that patient within 30 days of the CMS transplant (it is common for dates between sources to differ by one day). Finally, transplants indicated on the ME form are accepted if no transplant is listed for the patient within 30 days of the Medical Evidence transplant date.

HOSPITAL CDs

Hospitalization inpatient data are a subset of the data in the Institutional Claims file. No payment or cost variables are included on this two-CD set, which is for researchers who need data on hospital inpatient stays and on diagnoses and procedures for those stays, but who do not need payment data.

DIALYSIS MORBIDITY & MORTALITY CLAIMS CD

This CD contains files from the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study, with data extracted from all CMS Medicare payment data for the study patients. All data on Medicare payments for these patients are followed to the currently reported claims year.

CASE MIX ADEQUACY CLAIMS CD

This CD contains the Case Mix Adequacy Special Study file, and extracts data for the study patients from all CMS Medicare payment data. Medicare payment data for these patients are followed to the currently reported claims year. This file is useful for developing analyses to be run on full Medicare payment files.

MEDICARE PAYMENT DATA CDs

Medicare payment data on institutional claims are available for pre-1989 through 2005, while data on physician/supplier claims are available for 1991–2005. The 2005 claims will be available, along with other updated USRDS SAF CDs, by the end of 2007.

Institutional claims consist of all inpatient/outpatient claims (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health agency, and hospice), including outpatient dialysis claims. Physician/supplier claims account for 80 percent of the claims but only 20 percent of the dollars. The structure and content of the two types of claims differ, as do the files derived from them. Institutional claims are provided in two types of files: the Institutional Claims file, indicating the type of claim, the dollar amounts, the DRG code, the type of dialysis involved (if any), and the dates of service; and the Institutional Claims Detail file, containing details such as diagnosis and procedure codes. Many analyses require only the Institutional Claims files. Physician/supplier claims are contained in one type of file with one record for each claim line-item. The file includes dollar amounts, dates of service, diagnosis and procedure codes, and type and place of service.

Clinical performance measures: data products

The Clinical Performance Measures (CPM) data is a CMS project developed to collect information on the quality of care provided to the ESRD dialysis population. The data originates from yearly surveys of approximately 10,000 people completed by the patients’ primary care facilities, and was formerly known as the ESRD Core Indicators Project. This project results in a rich source of detailed information, useful in analyses of healthcare delivery in a sample of the dialysis population.

To further expand the value and use of the CPM data, we have linked patient data from the USRDS SAFs, enabling complete claims extraction from the SAFs for all identified patients. The resulting claims history has been combined with the CPM data to form a complete mini-set of the USRDS data products with supporting files. This enables researchers to add patient-level laboratory and dialysis prescription detail to a broad range of healthcare service event data over many years.

The USRDS Coordinating Center has made the CPM data available as USRDS Standard Analysis Files (SAF). The dataset contains CPM data collected in surveys from 1994–2004. A listing of available files and the corresponding costs can be found in Table b.e, on page 301, or you may contact the USRDS Coordinating Center for further information.

DISEASE-BASED COHORT CDs & 5 PERCENT GENERAL MEDICARE PAYMENT DATA CDs

Three disease-based cohort CD sets—for CKD, diabetes, and CHF—are built from the 5 percent general Medicare Claims SAFs. Patients on the diabetes CD, for example, are those with at least one diabetes ICD-9 diagnosis code (250.xx, 357.2, 362.0x, 366.41) identified during 1992–2003 in the 5 percent general Medicare IP, OP, HH, HS, SNF, and PB SAFs, and the other cohorts are created similarly.

Each CD contains a patient master file, a payor sequence file, and a set of comorbidity files. For details on these files, please visit our website or email us at usrds@usrds.org.

Separately, 5 percent general Medicare claims SAFs (IP, OP, SNF, HH, HS, PB, and DME) are also available in single or multiple years from 1992 to 2003. Data on the CDs are derived from data in the IP claims SAF files. No payment or cost variables are included, so these data are for researchers who need data on hospital inpatient stays and on diagnoses and procedures for those stays, but do not need payment data.

FILE MEDIA & FORMATS

SAFs are provided on CDs and DVDs as SAS files, and can be used by SAS on any 486 or Pentium PC with a CD/DVD reader. The SAS format is widely used, easily transported, and largely self-documenting. SAS is a commercially available data management and statistical analysis software system that runs on most computers, and is almost universally available on university computer systems. The SAFs take full advantage of the program’s ability to incorporate detailed documentation into the file. Researchers needing another format or medium must arrange for the conversion.

COSTS

File prices cover reproduction of files, documentation, administrative costs of handling the sales, and costs of technical support to researchers. Prices are subject to change.

DOCUMENTATION

The Researcher’s Guide to the USRDS Database provides most of the SAF documentation. It includes a codebook of variables, copies of data collection forms used by CMS, UNOS, and the USRDS Special Studies; a chapter on techniques for using the SAFs in SAS is also provided. The guide may be downloaded from the USRDS website, and a copy on CD-ROM will be sent to researchers with the purchase of the SAFs.

Data use acknowledgement  Top

Publications using USRDS data should include an acknowledgment and this notice: The data reported here have been supplied by the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the U.S. government.

Data release policy  Top

Since the SAFs and custom data files contain confidential, patient-specific data, their release requires the approval process described here. Investigators may contact the USRDS Project Officer at the NIDDK to discuss requests before preparing a proposal. To request and use USRDS data files, investigators should do the following:

Provide the USRDS Project Officer (PO) with a detailed description of the proposed investigation (see Table b.d). The summary must include goals, background data, an in-depth description of study design and methodology, and resources available for completing the project, and may be the description from a grant proposal or other application. The project must comply with the Privacy Act of 1974, and the summary should provide enough information to enable assessment of compliance. Guidelines for Privacy Act adherence are found in the “Agreement for Release of Data,” page 305. With your completed research proposal, please include a signed agreement for release of information from each investigator and analyst who will use the data files.

Indicate needed USRDS SAFs by name (i.e. Core, Transplant etc). If these files cannot meet requirements of the proposed research, investigators must specify precisely which data elements are needed, and budget for a substantially higher cost.

The investigator and the Coordinating Center (CC) will resolve any technical questions. The investigator will arrange payment with the CC, and payment must be received before the files will be released. Checks must be made payable to the Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation.

The NIH will review the project for technical merit and for conformity with the Privacy Act. The Project Officer will notify the investigator(s) in writing of the outcome, and if the project is not approved will discuss reasons for the decision. The PO will send a copy of the approval letters to the USRDS CC. When payment for the files has been received by the CC, the CC will prepare the files and documentation and send them to the investigator.

Any reports or articles resulting from use of the USRDS data must be submitted to the PO prior to submission for publication to assure adherence to the Privacy Act. The PO must respond within 30 days. If a report or article is determined not to adhere to the Privacy Act, it shall not be published until compliance with the Act is achieved. Assessment of compliance will not depend on the opinions and conclusions expressed by the investigators, nor will the PO’s approval indicate government endorsement of the investigator’s opinions and conclusions.

All publications using released data must contain the standard acknowledgement and disclaimer presented above. Investigators are requested to send copies of all final publications resulting from this research to both the PO and the USRDS CC.

Caveats  Top

This policy establishes conditions and procedures for the release of data from the USRDS, and is intended to ensure that data are made available to investigators in the pursuit of legitimate biomedical, cost-effectiveness, or other economic research.

The USRDS will not release data that identify individual patients, providers, or facilities. Since it might be possible, however, to infer identity from SAF data, these data are considered confidential. The USRDS “Agreement for Release of Data” contains a number of general and specific restrictions on the use of USRDS data, and investigators are expected to abide by these restrictions. If individually identifiable data are needed, the request should be submitted directly to CMS. Use of these data to identify and/or contact patients, facilities, or providers is prohibited by USRDS policy and by the Privacy Act of 1974.

The USRDS CC will provide data in any of the usual media (tape, disk, or hard copy). Analytical services other than review of the proposal and preparation of the data file will not be provided under the USRDS contract, though CC personnel may participate in analyses funded by other sources.